The leakiest White House in history
Drip, drip, drip ...
President Trump has run the most transparent White House in modern times.
It isn't that he has made an effort to be frank with the public about who he's meeting with or how decisions get made. In fact, his administration has been unusually secretive; as the head of the American Society of News Editors recently said, "Public data that was once available even without a Freedom of Information Act request has disappeared from public view, a trend of restricting access to government officials — especially those in agencies dealing with science and defense issues — has continued, and some forward-looking programs designed to improve the flow of information to the public that were created by prior administrations have been discontinued."
No, Trump's transparency has been entirely unintentional. It comes from the fact that this is, as far as anyone can tell, the leakiest White House in history. The result is an endless stream of stories about behind-the-scenes infighting, incompetence, and bad behavior that make the president and everyone who works for him look terrible.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Recently, a White House aide made a cruel remark about Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), saying about his opposition to the nomination of Gina Haspel to be CIA director, "It doesn't matter, he's dying anyway," which not only was leaked but turned into a story that is now nearly a week old and keeps going.
Understandably, this drives President Trump batty, and he lashed out on Twitter in his inimitable style:
The president is calling his own staff "traitors and cowards," but also insisting that the leaks don't really exist, which ... doesn't make much sense. Color me skeptical that either his angry tweeting or White House efforts to shut down the leaks will be successful; here's a golden oldie from when his presidency was less than a month old:
It didn't work then, and it hasn't worked since. Not that they haven't tried. In addition to regular staff meetings begging, cajoling, and threatening staff to get them to stop leaking (which are of course promptly leaked), in January staffers were prohibited from carrying cell phones while in the office. They have to leave their phones in their cars or deposit them in a locker when they arrive, though CNN reports that "it's common to find several staffers huddled around the lockers throughout the day, perusing their neglected messages." They've also taken electronic measures: "Men dressed in suits and carrying large handheld devices have been seen roaming the halls of the West Wing, moving from room to room, scouring the place for devices that aren't government-issued." How did CNN learn all this? You know the answer, don't you?
There are a certain number of leaks in every White House, as people maneuver to get their side of a story told, promote their policy ideas, or try to undercut a rival. But generally speaking, the more leaks there are, the less healthy your White House is. If everyone was committed to a single cause, felt supported and valued, and was devoted to their colleagues, they wouldn't be rushing to reporters to dish on all the chaos. That in turn makes everyone paranoid. "If you aren't able, in internal meetings, to speak your mind or convey thoughts or say anything that you feel without feeling like your colleagues will betray you, that creates a very difficult work environment," said Raj Shah, and he should know, because he's the deputy press secretary in this very White House.
The result, as yet another leaker told Axios, is that "you have to realize that working here is kind of like being in a never-ending 'Mexican Standoff.' Everyone has guns (leaks) pointed at each other and it's only a matter of time before someone shoots. There's rarely a peaceful conclusion so you might as well shoot first."
Though the leakiness has multiple causes, in the end it comes down to the president himself. If Trump commanded the kind of personal admiration that other presidents (both Democrat and Republican) had from their staffs, he'd be able to convince them to keep their mouths shut for the good of the team. But he doesn't; indeed, the topic of many leaks is how ignorant, capricious, and erratic Trump is, as though a staffer walked out of a meeting with him and said to themselves, "My god, I can't believe that nincompoop is actually the most powerful man on Earth. I've got to tell somebody."
Trump is not going to change, and there's little reason to think his White House is suddenly going to become a model of professionalism and restraint. Which is bad for them, but better for the rest of us. It may be a dumpster fire, but at least we'll continue to get an idea of what's burning.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
Are 'judge shopping' rules a blow to Republicans?
Today's Big Question How the abortion pill case got to the Supreme Court
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Climate change is driving Indian women to choose sterilization
under the radar Faced with losing their jobs, they are making a life-altering decision
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
'A great culture will be lost if the EV brigade gets its way'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published